Easier to read, downloadable & shareable PDF:https://bit.ly/2yzQKOk
DRINKING BLEACH AND INJECTING LIGHT
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?
I have no idea why I feel I should make an attempt to clear this up (I
can already hear the groans coming “don’t give up your day job”) but I hope I may
be able to shed some light (pun intended) or at the very least get some brain
cogs turning on some of the misinformation and confusion that has come out of
certain news sources, such as these:
“Sunlight won’t magic its way into your lungs to fight coronavirus” - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8252701/Coronavirus-dies-SUNLIGHT-just-minutes-reveals-striking-study.html?ito=social-facebook
Trump Disinfectant Remarks Echo Claims by Miracle-Cure Quacks - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/27/health/coronavirus-disinfectant-bleach-trump.html/
Trump suggests 'injection' of disinfectant to beat coronavirus and 'clean' the lungs - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-suggests-injection-disinfectant-beat-coronavirus-clean-lungs-n1191216
Chris Cuomo's wife Cristina is mocked for saying she bathed in CLOROX to treat coronavirus while the CNN host slams Trump's suggestion people could be infected with disinfectant - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8253577/Wife-CNN-host-Chris-Cuomo-mocked-saying-BATHED-Clorox-treat-coronavirus.html
CNN See Dr. Birx's reaction to Trump's dangerous suggestion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFKQGGf1iiI
Firstly, let’s be clear, it’s not because of Trump that I don’t listen to the ‘Mainstream Media’, it’s because of media idiocy such as the way they have reported this whole bleach fiasco! I agree that Trump wasn’t speaking clearly, sure, the ‘Orange Man’ can act like an arse or be an idiot, or whatever, but I’m after facts, not distorted so-called ‘information’ like the linked articles on the right.
In regards to drinking bleach, this was heavily misquoted, there was no mention by Trump of the word bleach or Lysol; but people are ‘stoopid’, they mishear, misinterpret, or later see part of a media report that does claim this, and stock up on cleaning products and start conducting home experiments with bleach, fish-tank cleaner, etc., (turns out this one probably wanted to murder her husband anyway - https://bit.ly/2VScMVA). Let’s face it, all it would take would be for Trump to say that jumping off a cliff kills Covid19 and some people would.
The media play on this and picks out ‘news’ of those far-out political supporters doing the dumbest shit “because their leader said so”, giving the illusion that if these supporters are so dumb then surely the leader isn’t competent enough to lead. Are you telling me that supporters of ole Joe Biden – whose campaign seems to be suffering a sad case of electile dysfunction – seriously have an IQ any higher or lower, or would do anything differently? No, of course not. It’s just the way it is, and the media have proven time and time again that they are there to manipulate facts and not inform.
There is a little something called Dunning-Kruger Effect and the truth is, we are all much dumber than we think. [The Dunning-Kruger Effect is essentially when you’re not aware of how much you don't know]. Many people associate it with ignorant or incompetent individuals, but the truth is, we can all be victims of it: there’s always someone that thinks they know more than the other person. You may think that I’m doing a fine example of proving that! Except I don’t really claim to know more, my only claim is that I actually made the effort to look for more information, and having discovered that what we were being told was seriously inaccurate, I’m trying to put across what the real experts know about this subject, rather than what the media would like you to believe.
My point is, instead of blindly listening to the media or uninformed friends’ viewpoints, isn’t it time more of us used our own brains and thought outside of the box? That we stopped slinging hatred and terms like ‘wacko’, ‘conspiracy theorist’, ‘nutjob’ and ‘moron’ around to those suggesting something outside of the mainstream, to those who dare to look further and do their own research?
I have no history in the medical field (unless spending considerable time as a patient counts?!) although for some time now, I have been aware of these treatments I will be talking about. This has led me to attempt to break things down so that other laymen like myself can understand what is really possible, and what is going on with all these claims and counter-claims about unusual – but medically approved – forms of treatment.
So, how about we look into sunlight and drinking and injecting bleach?
Section 1: April 23rd Whitehouse Briefing
To get the whole context of everything I’d recommend watching the White House Briefing 23/04. I’m going to break some of it down and go a little more in depth into light and disinfection treatments, providing some of the background to what you may consider to be crazy!
Watch the full 23/04/20 White House Coronavirus Briefing here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsQnfpfIa_o
Prior to Trump’s comments that were ridiculed and misquoted by the media, William N Bryan (head of science and technology at Department of Homeland Security) presented his department’s findings. This gives context to Trump’s following comments. Take some time to listen to or read/skim through William Bryan’s statement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gysW87xniUE
Transcribed below, I’ve highlighted notable points in bold. If you want to check the full White House transcription it’s here:
“So let me illustrate with this first slide. If you look to the
right, you’ll see that term “half-life,” with a bunch of timestamps on there.
First, let me tell you what a “half-life”
is. We don’t measure the virus as far as how long we live on the surface;
we have to measure the decay of the virus in terms of its half-life, because we
don’t know certain elements. We don’t know how much a person expectorates
when he — when he spits — right? — when he sneezes, whatever the case may
be. We don’t know how much virus is in there. So it’s — that has a
long — a bearing on how long the virus is going to be alive and active.
So we measure it in half life because half-life doesn’t change. So if you look
at an 18-hour half-life, what you’re basically saying is that every 18 hours,
the virus — it’s the life of the virus is cut in half. So if you start
with 1,000 particles of the virus, in 18 hours, you’re down to 500. And
18 hours after that, you’re down to 250, and so on and so forth. That’s
important, as I explain in the rest of the chart.
If you look at the first three lines, when
you see the word “surface,” we’re talking about nonporous surfaces: door
handles, stainless steel. And if you look at the — as the temperature increases, as the humidity increases, with no sun
involved, you can see how drastically the half-life goes down on that virus.
So the virus is dying at a much more
rapid pace, just from exposure to higher temperatures and just from exposure to
humidity.
If you look at the fourth line, you inject
summer — the sunlight into that. You
inject UV rays into that. The same effects on line two — as 70 to 35
degrees with 80 percent humidity on the surface. And look at line four,
but now you inject* the sun. The half-life goes from six hours to two
minutes. That’s how much of an impact UV rays has on the virus.
The
last two lines are aerosols. What does it do in the air? We have a
very unique capability — I was discussing this with the President prior to
coming out; he wanted me to convey it to you — on how we do this. I
believe we’re the only lab in the country that has this capability.
But
if you can imagine a Home Depot bucket — a five-gallon Home Depot bucket —
we’re able to take a particle — and this was developed and designed by our
folks at the NBACC. We’re able to
take a particle of a virus and suspend it in the air inside of this drum and
hit it with various temperatures, various humidity levels, multiple different
kinds of environmental conditions, to include sunlight. And we’re able to
measure the decay of that virus while it’s suspended in the air. This is
how we do our aerosol testing.
We
worked with John Hopkin Applied Physics Lab, and we actually developed a larger
drum to do actually more testing. And it’s four times the size of
that. So this is the capability that we bring to this effort.
So, in summary, within the
conditions we’ve tested to date, the virus
in droplets of saliva survives best in indoors and dry conditions. The
virus does not survive as well in droplets of saliva. And that’s
important because a lot of testing being done is not necessarily being done,
number one, with the COVID-19 virus, and number two, in saliva or respiratory
fluids.And thirdly, the virus dies
the quickest in the presence of direct sunlight under these conditions.
And when you — when you look at that chart, look at the aerosol as you breathe it; you put it in a room, 70 to 75
degrees, 20 percent humidity, low humidity, it lasts — the half-life is about
an hour. But you get outside, and it cuts down to a minute and a half.
A very significant difference when it gets hit with UV rays.
“…You’ll see a number of some practical
applications. For example, increasing the temperature and humidity of
potentially contaminated indoor spaces appears to reduce the stability of the
virus. And extra care may be warranted for dry environments that do not
have exposure to solar light.
We’re also testing disinfectants readily
available. We’ve tested bleach, we’ve tested isopropyl alcohol on the
virus, specifically in saliva or in respiratory fluids. And I can tell
you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes; isopropyl alcohol will
kill the virus in 30 seconds, and that’s with no manipulation, no rubbing —
just spraying it on and letting it go. You rub it and it goes away even
faster. We’re also looking at other disinfectants,
specifically looking at the COVID-19 virus in saliva.”
*He doesn’t mean ‘inject’ UV literally, it’s just a
figure of speech for ‘add’ or ‘introduce’.
POTUS in response to William Bryans
Statement:
THE
PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. So I asked Bill a question that
probably some of you are thinking of, if you’re totally into that world, which
I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a
tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think
you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And
then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do
either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test
that too. It sounds interesting.
ACTING UNDER SECRETARY BRYAN: We’ll get to the right folks who could.
THE PRESIDENT: Right. And then I see the disinfectant, where it
knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do
something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because
you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the
lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re
going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds
interesting to me.
So we’ll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in
one minute, that’s — that’s pretty powerful.
Notice he says “…a way we can do something like that …” not actually injecting disinfectant, but some kind of treatment (obviously medical, given the context) that has a cleaning, disinfectant effect. I hope that with more context this already makes a little more sense, if not keep reading
Section 2: The Power of Sunlight
Why is it that ‘light therapy’ is portrayed as being such a far-fetched idea, when we’ve already been using light therapies for 100s of years, and it’s used for disinfecting – for killing viruses and bacteria – every day, in every hospital in the world? The following are just a selection of the different kinds of light therapy that are already commonly in use. Hardly a crackpot idea is it?
UV Light
UV light is commonly used to kill bacteria and disinfect surfaces:
“Viruses don’t reproduce on their own, but they do have genetic material, either DNA or RNA. They reproduce by attaching to cells and injecting their DNA. Some viruses burst out of the infected cell (this form of reproduction is called the lytic cycle), while others merge into the infected cell, reproducing every time that cell divides (lysogenic).
If you’ve ever gotten sunburn, you’ve had a taste of how UV light kills viruses: UV light can damage DNA. A DNA molecule is made of two strands bound together by four bases, adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). These bases are like an alphabet, and their sequence forms instructions for cells to reproduce.
UV light can cause thymine bases to fuse together, scrambling the DNA sequence and essentially throwing a wrench into the machinery. Since the DNA sequence is no longer correct, it can no longer replicate properly. This is how UV light annihilates viruses, by destroying their ability to reproduce.
“…We can look to previous coronaviruses, such as SARS and MERS, for insight. Studies on both SARS and MERS show that UV light could inactivate the viruses, so it’s not unreasonable to expect that it will have a similar effect on COVID-19.”
Far-UVC light:
A new tool to control the spread of airborne mediated microbial diseases -
Airborne-mediated microbial diseases represent one of the major challenges to worldwide public health. Common examples are influenza, appearing in seasonal and pandemic forms, and bacterially-based airborne-mediated diseases such as tuberculosis, increasingly emerging in multi-drug resistant form.
A direct approach to prevent the transmission of airborne-mediated disease is inactivation of the corresponding airborne pathogens, and in fact the airborne antimicrobial efficacy of ultraviolet (UV) light has long been established. Germicidal UV light can also efficiently inactivate both drug-sensitive and multi-drug-resistant bacteria, as well as differing strains of viruses. However, the widespread use of germicidal ultraviolet light in public settings has been very limited because conventional UVC light sources are a human health hazard, being both carcinogenic and cataractogenic.
By contrast, we have earlier shown that far-UVC light generated by filtered excimer lamps emitting in the 207 to 222 nm wavelength range, efficiently inactivates drug-resistant bacteria, without apparent harm to exposed mammalian skin…
UV Sterilization:
Far-UVC Light kills airborne flu viruses without danger to humans –
Extract from: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/lasers-sources/article/16555364/uv-sterilization-faruvc-light-kills-airborne-flu-viruses-without-danger-to-humans
Continuous low doses of far-ultraviolet C (far-UVC) light can kill airborne flu viruses without harming human tissues, according to a new study at the Center for Radiological Research at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (New York, NY).1 The findings suggest that use of overhead far-UVC light in hospitals, doctors’ offices, schools, airports, airplanes, and other public spaces could provide a powerful check on seasonal influenza epidemics, as well as influenza pandemics…
Also see: https://www.faruv.com/product
Heliotherapy
Heliotherapy (also called climatotherapy) makes simple use of intentional direct exposure to natural sunlight to get the therapeutic benefits of the included ultraviolet radiation.
Phototherapy
Consists of exposure to daylight or to specific wavelengths of light using lasers, light-emitting diodes, fluorescent lamps, dichroic lamps or very bright, full-spectrum light, usually controlled with various devices. The light administered for a prescribed amount of time.
Types of Phototherapy:
• UV light exposure to increase vitamin D levels and manage autoimmune or allergic skin conditions, such as psoriasis, vitiligo, and eczema4
• White, blue or blue-green light exposure to manage jaundice in newborns5
• Bright blue or white light therapy to manage seasonal affective disorders, circadian rhythm disorders, and jet lag6
• Red light and near-infrared wavelengths to energize the mitochondria through photobiomodulation, which can have anti-aging, wound healing, and anti-inflammatory effects7
From: https://www.sunlighten.com/blog/difference-light-therapy-near-infrared-therapy/
Find out more about photobiomodulation here: https://www.thorlaser.com/photobiomodulation.php
Not forgetting phototherapy for cancer and precancers:
“A certain kind of phototherapy known as photodynamic therapy is used to treat some kind of cancer and precancers. It involves using a special type of drug, called a photosensitizer, in combination with a special kind of light. Photosensitizers produce a kind of active oxygen that, when exposed to specific light wavelengths, kills nearby cells.
“The photosensitizer drug is applied topically to the body. Both normal and cancerous cells absorb the drug, but it is thought that the drug concentrates preferentially in quickly dividing cancer cells. Furthermore, normal cells clear the drug faster than cancerous cells. So, at the point when most of the photosensitizer has left the healthy cells but is still present in the cancerous ones, light is applied to the area to be treated. A reaction occurs between the light and the photosensitizer drug, creating activated oxygen inside the cancer cells. This activated oxygen kills the cancer cells.
“Photodynamic therapy is used to treat cancer like cancer of the esophagus, endobronchial cancer (non-small cell lung cancer), and precancerous conditions like Barret's esophagus.
“In addition to being simply called phototherapy, you may hear of photodynamic therapy being referred to as photoradiation therapy or photochemotherapy."
See also -
https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/other/ultraviolet-light
The aforementioned therapies are different forms of irradiation (exposure to the action of electromagnetic radiation (for example, heat, light, x-rays). Let’s have a look into Blood Irradiation:
Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation (UBI)/ BioPhotonics in particular has been around for a while:
Blood irradiation therapy is a alternative medical procedure in which the blood is exposed to low level light (often laser light) for therapeutic reasons.[1] The practice was originally developed in the U.S,[1] but most recent research on it has been conducted in Germany (by UV lamps) and in Russia (in all variants).[2][3][4][5] Low-level laser therapy has been tested for a wide range of conditions, but rigorous double-blinded studies have not yet been performed.[6] Furthermore, it has been claimed that ultraviolet irradiation of blood kills bacteria by DNA damage and also activation of the immune system. Blood irradiation therapy is highly controversial, and has fallen from mainstream use since its heyday in the 1940s and 1950s.[1]
Blood irradiation therapy can be administered in three ways: extracorporeally, transcutaneously, and intraveneously. The extracorporeal (outside the body) method removes blood from the body and irradiates it in a special cuvette (tube). This method is used for the ultraviolet (UV) blood irradiation (UVBI) by UV lamps. In the transcutaneous method, the radiation goes through the skin, by placing a device on the outside of the skin. In the intravenous method, a device is inserted into a large blood vessel. The laser light is monochromatic.
Despite
Skeptics, Alternative Doctors ‘Detoxifying’ Blood With UV Ray (2016)
Traditional UBI uses an external light box to treat a blood specimen before returning it to
the patient’s body. A new form of UBI shines a light through an
IV catheter, directly onto the bloodstream.The new system, which
has not yet been approved for commercial use by the Food and Drug
Administration, belongs to UVLrx Therapeutics of Oldsmar, near Clearwater. In
September 2015 the European Union approved the sale of one of its models, but
it must be exported.Meanwhile, the
traditional light box treatment, approved by the FDA many years ago, is easy to
find on the Internet. At the Florida Integrative Medicine Center in Sarasota,
UBI patients sit in recliners, hooked up to IVs. About 200 cc’s, a little less
than a cup, of their blood will be exposed to a light source in a small brown
box nearby.“The blood flows out, the blood flows back in -- the closed system --
and it passes through ultraviolet light as it goes back in,” says Dr. John
Monhollon, owner of the practice. “So any immune challenge you have, whether
it’s an infection or cancer, it’s going to help your body fight it.” …
… Lowe’s site, drsubi.com, lists 131 studies that have been published on
the ultraviolet blood therapy, but few since the 1950s are in English.
Most since then were done by Russians,
including many that have not been translated. One involved treatment of 312
workers who were exposed to radiation during clean-up after the 1986 nuclear
accident at Chernobyl.
In the United States,
enthusiasm for UBI began to wane after the
advent of antibiotics in the 1940s and the discovery of a polio vaccine in the
1950s.Americans forgot about UBI in the era of
pharmaceuticals, according to Dr. Monhollon.“It was actually suppressed for decades and
decades,” he says. “So it’s only been just recently that it has become popular
again.”
While it’s true that exposure to light kills many
harmful organisms, he said, that raises questions about the safety of blood
irradiation. If UV light damages the protein structure of bacteria, could it also
damage blood cells? No, says UVLrx Therapeutics, the Florida company
that developed a device to deliver light to the bloodstream through an IV
catheter. The company holds a
patent on the part that makes this possible.
The
European Union okayed the device for sale there last year. UVLrx Therapeutics tested a similar device on
500 U.S. subjects this year, according to clinicaltrials.gov. The pilot study, which began in January and ended in October, did not include a control group. It was aimed at establishing safety and feasibility, documents said, although patients were to be asked whether they felt a difference in their energy level.
From:
Aforementioned further studies listed here:
http://drsubi.com/published-studies/effects-of-bpt/
One of the Russian studies in particular:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3590539
The link below has all of the history and information you could ever want on UBI, here is a short extract:
Ultraviolet
blood irradiation: Is it time to remember “the cure that time forgot”?
UBI had
originally been an American discovery, but then transitioned to being more
studied in Russia and other eastern countries, which had long concentrated on
physical therapies for many diseases, which were more usually treated with
drugs in the West. Over the years its acceptance by the broad medical community
has been hindered by uncertainties about its mechanism of action. Confusion has
been caused by the widely held idea that since UV is used for sterilization of
water and instruments; therefore its use against infection must also rely on
UV-mediated direct destruction of pathogens. Another highly confusing aspect is
the wide assortment of diseases that have been claimed to be successfully treated
by UBI. It is often held that something that appears to be “too good to be
true” usually is.
UVLrx
Interestingly,
a company named UVLrx popped up in the media around 2016 when they
announced they had received their CE marking to commercially sell their
UVLrx 1500 multi-wavelength, intravenous light therapy systems in the
EU. The device is inserted into a vein like a catheter, and then emits
different wavelengths of light into the blood.
Further links:
UVLrx in depth Forbes article (2016) -
Treatment of Viral Hepatitis with the Knott Technic of Blood Irradiation -
Biological Effects of Sunlight, Ultraviolet Radiation, Visible Light, Infrared Radiation and Vitamin D for Health -
Wellness Clinics Offering UBI -
So – it seems ‘light therapy’ of one sort or another is very widely used, very effective, and respected as a well-known treatment for viruses by the medical profession. So why all the headlines like:
“'Sunlight won't magic its way into your lungs to fight coronavirus': Scientists rubbish Donald Trump's claim hitting the body with UV rays could cure the illness…” (Mail Online)
Why is the media portraying light therapy as such a crackpot, far-fetched idea, when obviously it is one of the best treatments we have for viruses and is already widely used? Surely research into how it can be best used against Covid19 would be some of the most worthwhile research that could be carried out?
Hmmm… Let’s look at Bleach and Disinfectant…
Section 3: Bleach and Disinfectant
People laugh at the idea of injecting disinfectant, but did you know that disinfectant is a part of many vaccines?
Some vaccines contain traces of disinfectant used in the manufacturing process, to name two: Thiomersal (which has a role as a disinfectant) and the disinfectant and biocide formaldehyde (which occurs naturally in the body anyway).
From:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine_dioxide
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is a chemical compound consisting of one chlorine
atom and two oxygen atoms. It
is a reddish to yellowish-green gas at room temperature that dissolves in
water. It is used for a variety of antimicrobial uses, including the
disinfection of drinking water. Chlorine dioxide gas is usually produced onsite
from sodium chlorate or sodium chlorite.
Here is one of the official studies Trump was hinting towards in his statement:
From: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343742
Determination
of the Effectiveness of Oral Chlorine Dioxide in the Treatment of COVID 19
Brief
Summary:
Abstract: The objective of this study is to review,
through prospective case research, the efficacy of oral chlorine
dioxide in the treatment of patients with COVID infection 19. The
research will be carried out between April and June 2020 with a
quasi-experimental design in two health care centers on a sample of twenty (20)
patients, through direct intervention, who will measure the changes in the
manifest symptoms of infection and negativity. a COVID 19 after administration
of the study preparation, to determine the effectiveness of chlorine dioxide in
the treated group.
Based on the results that are found and on the
evaluation of efficacy on the basis of clinical improvement on a scale of 1 to
5, and of the negativization of COVID 19, we can conclude whether the
therapeutic efficacy in this investigation is considered good by verifying
whether or not there is efficacy of treatment with in COVID 19.
With this research, it is hoped to stimulate the
search for new therapeutic options in the treatment of COVID 19 and contribute
to the development of NEW options in medications, considering the immense
number of deaths and morbidity that currently exists in the present pandemic.
Diluted oral administration of chlorine
dioxide is not a new idea, but is said to increase oxygen and clean the blood.
This is where it gets ‘wacky’ and why it’s most likely the media are targeting
all of this so much - but stick with it. This treatment is known as an
alternative therapy “The Miracle Solution, CD Protocal, and Miracle Mineral
Supplement”.
“In July 30, 2010, and again on October
1, 2010, the United
States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
warned against the use of the product "Miracle Mineral
Supplement", or
"MMS", which when made up according to instructions produces chlorine
dioxide. MMS has been marketed as a treatment for a variety of conditions,
including HIV, cancer, autism, and acne.
The FDA warnings informed consumers that MMS can cause serious harm to health
and stated that it has received numerous reports of nausea, diarrhea, severe
vomiting, and life-threatening low blood pressure caused by dehydration.[49][50] This warning was repeated for a third and fourth time on 12 August
2019, as well as April 8, 2020, comparing ingesting MMS as "the same as
drinking bleach," and urging consumers to not use them or "give these
products to their children for any reason."
No wonder the media are going crazy! Could
it be that POTUS is suggesting natural and alternative therapies are being
investigated? What a loon! But wait… This isn’t the only disinfectant, we’re forgetting
about Hydrogen Peroxide!

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a weak acid
with strong oxidizing properties. It is water with one extra oxygen
molecule, hence is very similar to water in appearance, chemical formula,
and reaction products. It is extremely dangerous in concentrated form, but
uniquely useful in diluted form. It is stable at room temperature. It is also a
powerful bleaching agent, and is used for whitening paper. Hydrogen peroxide is
widely administered as an antiseptic, as
a disinfectant, as an oxidizer, amongst other uses. Its use is both
effective and safe.
Rain and snow contain hydrogen peroxide. Plants synthesize it during
photosynthesis; so all fresh vegetables and fruits contain it. It is also
generated by the lignifying xylem of many vascular plants (higher plants, for
example, trees), which is very important for the plant metabolism. The
planktons in the sea produce the maximum hydrogen peroxide. Our body’s immune system also generates it.
It is present in mother’s milk, especially in the first milk (colostrum) after
childbirth, which boosts the baby’s
immune system.
According
to William Campbell Douglass, M.D. of Georgia, hydrogen peroxide is an
essential metabolite, meaning that it is necessary to life’s process. Post
World War I, intravenous infusion of its
diluted form was used in the treatment of epidemic pneumonia. Studies
conducted in 1940s by Father Richard Willhelm, pioneer in promoting hydrogen
peroxide, have revealed that it can be used to treat several ailments, right
from bacterial-related mental illness to even polio.
Hydrogen
peroxide is used as an antiseptic for sterilization in cleaning hospital
toilets, bathrooms, and ambulances. It can effectively kill the disease-causing
microbes. It is also used for disinfecting medical and surgical equipment.
It has been approved by the American Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for use as mouthwash. In fact, many of the renowned
companies manufacturing dental-related products use hydrogen peroxide. It can
also help heal all the skin-related infections such as acne, cold sores, insect
bites, pimples, burns, and so on.
It is used in the treatment of arthritis. It
supplies oxygen and kills the anaerobic pathogens Streptococcus viridans that cause arthritis. Due to its
properties, hydrogen peroxide
therapy has been used in many
of the diseases such as viral, bacterial, fungal and yeast infection,
allergies, food allergies and poisonings, gingivitis (inflammation of gums),
pneumonia, digestive problems, cancer, multiple sclerosis, anemia, sinusitis,
liver cirrhosis, and so on. - https://sciencestruck.com/hydrogen-peroxide-medical-uses)
Like
all other peroxides, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) also
consists of a relatively weaker O−O bond, which is susceptible for light or heat. In the presence
of light (the UV light from the sun catalyzes the reaction), H2O2 spontaneously
decomposes into water and oxygen. -
The Photochemical Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide - https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja01143a052
So, hydrogen peroxide obviously has A LOT
of uses and with UV light and heat, it decomposes into water and oxygen.
Injecting Hydrogen
Peroxide?
There was a small flurry of
interest in the intra-arterial infusion of hydrogen peroxide during the
1960s, when researchers tested its use in humans and animals for
regional oxygenation to enhance the susceptibility of tumors to
radiation therapy.
Since the late 1970s, a small group of
practitioners has advocated the use of intravenous infusions of hydrogen
peroxide for a multitude of indications. Their rationale is based
largely on the research and clinical experiences of the late Charles H.
Farr, MD, PhD (1927-1998). A true champion of this therapeutic method,
Charles H. Farr is often referred to as the "Father of Oxidative
Medicine."
Dr. Farr discovered "a positive metabolic effect to
intravenous infusions of hydrogen peroxide," and authored an impressive
workbook on the subject. In his workbook, Dr. Farr introduced his case
for intravenous infusions of hydrogen peroxide as follows: "Its ability
to oxidize almost any physiologic or pathologic substance, in addition
to producing increased tissue and cellular oxygen tensions, has proven
it to have therapeutic value." He noted that hydrogen peroxide "is
produced by all cells of the body for many different physiological
reasons." He cited its role in the destruction of infectious pathogens
by phagocytes, and mentions that it is "involved in many metabolic
pathways which utilize oxidases. . . and hydrogen peroxide is involved
in protein, carbohydrate, fat metabolism, immunity, vitamin and mineral
metabolism, or any other system you might wish to explore."athogen
colonization present in most noses and throats stops the 24/7 swallowing
of these pathogens and their associated toxins.” -
http://www.foodgrade-hydrogenperoxide.com/id43.html
There is a lot of convoluted information out
there regarding modern Hydrogen Peroxide research and therapies. It’s another
alternative therapy claimed to cure cancer, viral and bacterial infections and
so on, and you can find numerous of kits and guides on administering it
yourself, not that I would recommend doing so. However, I have found this explanation
by Ron Kennedy M.D to be some very
interesting food for thought:
Intravenous
Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy and Infectious Disease
When an infective
disease becomes obvious to the person who has the infection the hydrogen
peroxide defense mechanism already has been overwhelmed by the number of
viruses or bacteria involved, and the immune system is into its secondary line
of defense: the tedious process of analyzing the invading organism and making
antibodies, which deal specifically with that organism.
The invention of man-made antibiotics, beginning in the 1920s, was a
revolution in medical science. However, as a strategy for fighting infection it
is clearly second best, as the body itself demonstrates. When the body is challenged with an infection, it first turns to
hydrogen peroxide. Only when this fails does it turn to its own antibody
production. If hydrogen peroxide is so effective, why is it
not made use of in “modern” medicine? The reason is simple. Hydrogen peroxide cannot be patented.
It is present in the ocean, it is present in rainwater, it is present in
vegetables, it is present in every cell of your body right now. It must be
classified as a food, because it is part of all fresh food of plant origin.
Because it is produced in the human body, it is undeniably safe. Since it is a
food and cannot be patented, there is no big profit to be made on it. - https://www.austinozone.com/therapies/intravenous-hydrogen-peroxide-therapy/
The below is the most recent study I have been able to find. Notice how
the study was conducted with and without irradiation:
Biological effects of hydrogen peroxide administered intratumorally
with or without irradiation in murine tumors
Despite insufficient laboratory data, radiotherapy
after intratumoral injection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
is increasingly being used clinically
for radioresistant tumors. Especially, this treatment might become an
alternative definitive treatment for early and advanced breast cancer in
patients who refuse any type of surgery. The purpose of this study was to
investigate the biological effects and appropriate combination methods of
irradiation and H2O2 in vivo. SCCVII tumor cells transplanted into the legs of
C3H/HeN mice were used. Chronological changes of intratumoral distribution of
oxygen bubbles after injection of H2O2 were investigated
using computed tomography. The effects of H2O2 alone and
in combination with single or five‐fraction
irradiation were investigated using a growth delay assay. The optimal
timing of H2O2 injection was investigated. Immunostaining
of tumors was performed using the hypoxia marker pimonidazole. Oxygen bubbles decreased gradually and
almost disappeared after 24 h. Administration of H2O2
produced 2–3 days’ tumor growth delay. Tumor
regrowth was slowed further when H2O2
was injected before irradiation. The group irradiated immediately after H2O2
injection showed the longest tumor growth delay. Dose‐modifying factors
were 1.7–2.0 when combined with single irradiation and 1.3–1.5 with
fractionated irradiation. Pimonidazole staining was weaker in tumors injected
with H2O2. H2O2 injection alone had
modest antitumor effects. Greater tumor
growth delays were demonstrated by combining irradiation and H2O2
injection. The results of the present study could serve as a basis for
evaluating results of various clinical studies on this treatment. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581514/
Also check this out:
How Light Turns
Ordinary Hydrogen Peroxide into a MRSA Treatment
Cheng’s lab was most interested
in tackling MRSA, since it’s difficult to treat and can cause deadly pneumonia
infections and sepsis. MRSA infections affect about 90,000 people each year in
the US, and cause around 20,000 of those people to die.
While taking a closer look at
MRSA in their lab, Cheng’s team realized that MRSA’s signature golden color
could be the golden ticket to a powerful new treatment.
Golden pigmentation is the
universal signature of S. aureus,” he says. While imaging S. aureus under the
microscope, the team noticed that blue light caused a traumatic photobleaching
effect—destroying pigment molecules responsible for the cells’ golden color—in
as fast as seconds of exposure. “For imaging purposes, this is bad,” Cheng
says. “But if it’s bleached, we wondered, is it still alive?” “Typically, MRSA and other types of cells are
able to withstand being doused with hydrogen peroxide through the defenses of
their cell membranes. But after blue light phototherapy, MRSA’s membranes
become temporarily pockmarked with holes. When
hydrogen peroxide is delivered in combination with blue light, it’s able to
flood the insides of MRSA cells and cause them to biologically implode,
eradicating 99.9 percent of bacteria.” - https://www.bu.edu/articles/2019/blue-light-therapy-mrsa-treatment/
Drinking Hydrogen
Peroxide?
It appears there are numerous Drs and
alternative Drs who recommend drinking a very diluted amount but there are
little in the way of published medical studies available, at least as far as I can tell.
Hydrogen
peroxide therapy is fast gaining popularity through books like "The One
Minute Cure" by Madison Cavanaugh. It requires you to place a certain
number of drops of 35 percent, food-grade
hydrogen peroxide into 6 to 10 oz. of distilled water. Drink this mixture three
times per day, then supposedly, this therapy will cause the hydrogen peroxide
to release one of its oxygen molecules, thereby oxygenating the body. Remember,
hydrogen peroxide can be volatile, and should be taken with caution. Any
changes to your diet should be under the guidance of a licensed health care
practitioner. - https://www.leaf.tv/articles/the-benefits-of-hydrogen-peroxide-therapy/
Inhaling/Vaporising
Hydrogen Peroxide?
Interestingly,
Dr Thomas Levy (www.peakenergy.com) focuses on a much safer alternative
which is becoming increasingly popular during this outbreak:
A recent study,
published in the Journal of Hospital
Infection, shows that even just 0.5 percent hydrogen peroxide could kill human
coronaviruses, such as those that caused SARS
and MERS. The findings backed a 2009
research that found inhaling vaporized hydrogen peroxide could lead to 99
percent inactivation of virus activities.
Vaporized hydrogen peroxide has long been
considered effective in removing viruses. Researchers in 1997 discovered that
the compound could completely inactivate a range of exotic animal viruses.
Experts
said inhaling the vapor using a nebulizer has been the most convenient to
receive hydrogen peroxide to fight viral infections. The microscopic mist can
easily reach deep into the nostrils, sinuses and lungs, which are commonly
affected by respiratory diseases like COVID-19.
Effective
hydrogen peroxide nebulization quite literally, ‘chops the head off of the
snake,’
and the virus present elsewhere in the body can then readily be mopped up when
the new virus influx has been terminated,” Levy said.
The health expert recommends using the nebulizer
with hydrogen peroxide for 10 to 15 mins, 4 times a day, until the symptoms of
the infection improve. “As
it is a completely non-toxic therapy, nebulization can be administered as often
as desired,” Levy noted. “If done on a daily basis at least once, a very
positive impact on bowel and gut function will often be realized as killing the
chronic pathogen colonization present in most noses and throats stops the 24/7
swallowing of these pathogens and their associated toxins.”
The Studies: What they tell us
The most relevant study is one that was done
earlier this year in the Journal of Hospital Infection. They studied 0.5% hydrogen peroxide, 6X weaker
than the 3% typically used, and found that it killed human coronaviruses and
SARS corona viruses and MERS.
Another study, published in the American Journal of Infection Control in Y
2009, assessed the efficacy of vaporized hydrogen peroxide against viruses on
various surfaces, finding exposure to hydrogen peroxide vapor at a
concentration of 10 parts per million resulted in 99% inactivation after 2.5
mins.
And a Y 2014 study in the Journal of Hospital Infection found hydrogen
peroxide vapor eliminated an array of viruses on stainless steel, including
human adenovirus 1, transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus of pigs (TGEV, a
SARS-CoV surrogate), avian influenza virus and swine influenza virus. Read the full article - https://www.livetradingnews.com/surviving-the-coronavirus-disease-how-hydrogen-peroxide-works-172241.html
Further information on Hydrogen Peroxide and Nebulizers:
The Effect
of PH On The Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide -
Did you know that
Vitamin C generates natural Hydrogen Peroxide?
Pharmacological
ascorbate (vitamin C) as a pro-drug eliminates or kills influenza virus,
probable by producing steady-state concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)
in extracellular fluid.- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931805
Cancer
researchers have homed in on how high-dose vitamin C kills cancer cells. Vitamin C breaks down to generate hydrogen
peroxide, which can damage tissue and DNA. The new study shows that tumor
cells with low levels of catalase enzyme activity are much less capable of
removing hydrogen peroxide than normal cells, and are
more susceptible to damage and death when they are exposed to high
doses of vitamin C. - https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170109134014.htm
Vitamin C
is also a potent antioxidant. Some studies show that vitamin C may help
reduce the symptoms and length of the common cold. Vitamin C plays many roles
in the chemistry of the human body. It’s needed to make collagen. This is a
critical part of the body's connective tissue. It also helps increase the
absorption of iron from the intestines. This is needed to make
hemoglobin. This is the oxygen-carrying pigment inside of red blood cells.- https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?contenttypeid=19&contentid=VitaminC
Side Note:Clinical trials on the effects of vitamin C on the new coronavirus are
underway
New
York hospitals began treating patients with vitamin C, based on reports that
it's helped people in China. The doses are 16 times the recommended daily dose. "The
patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not
get vitamin C," Northwell Health critical care specialist Dr. Andrew G.
Weber told the New York Post. There are at least two clinical trials testing vitamin
C's effects on the new coronavirus, one in Italy and one in China. In
Hubei, China, 140 COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, will take 12 grams of
vitamin C via IV to see if the dose will help them fight off the disease. It is
not recommended that anyone try to replicate the trial themselves: getting
vitamins via IV is different from consuming a handful of pills, and taking that
much vitamin C without a doctor's supervision could be lethal. - https://www.insider.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-vitamin-c-and-coronavirus-2020-4
More
Articles:
New York Hospitals Treating Corona
Patients 6000 Milligrams of Vitamin C –
Hospital
Turns To High Dose Vitamin C –
A new
clinical trial to test high-dose vitamin C in patients with COVID-19 –
Early Large
Does Intravenous Vitamin C is the Treatment of Chose for 2019-nCov Pneumonia-
Further links on Vitamin C studies (so much to be found):
Orange
juice vs vitamin C: effect on hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in
mononuclear blood cells –
Cancer-Treatment
Therapies Vitamin C –
Ascorbate
in pharmacologic concentrations selectively generates ascorbate radical and
hydrogen peroxide in extracellular fluid in vivo –
The War
against Vitamin C –
Why High
Dose Vitamin C Kills Cancer Cells –
Section 4: Blood Oxygenation
It’s clear that Hydrogen Peroxide and Chlorine
Dioxide can both be administered in ways that oxygenate the blood. So why is this important in relation to
Coronavirus?
Well, have a scan through the explanations
below – basically what you’ll find is that COVID-19 causes a pathology in some
ways similar to pneumonia, where immune cells that target and kill
virus-infected cells, leave fluid and dead cells – pus – behind. This means the
lungs cannot effectively oxygenate the blood, causing oxygen levels in the
blood to plummet, causing it to become harder and harder to breathe until some
patients, sadly lose the battle.
'Silent hypoxia' may be killing COVID-19 patients. But there's hope.
As
doctors see more and more COVID-19 patients, they are noticing an odd trend:
Patients whose blood oxygen saturation
levels are exceedingly low but who are hardly gasping for breath.
These patients are quite sick, but their
disease does not present like typical acute respiratory distress syndrome
(ARDS), a type of lung failure known from the 2003 outbreak of the SARS
coronavirus and other respiratory diseases. Their
lungs are clearly not effectively oxygenating
the blood, but these patients are alert and feeling
relatively well, even as doctors debate whether to intubate them by placing a
breathing tube down the throat.
The concern with this presentation, called
"silent hypoxia," is that patients are showing up to the hospital in
worse health than they realize. But there might be a way to prevent that,
according to a New York Times Op-Ed by emergency department physician Richard
Levitan. If sick patients were given oxygen-monitoring devices called pulse
oximeters to monitor their symptoms at home, they might be able to seek medical
treatment sooner, and ultimately avoid the most invasive treatments.
"This
is not a new phenomenon," said Dr. Marc Moss, the division head of
Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine at the University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus. There are other conditions in which patients are
extremely low on oxygen but don't feel any sense of suffocation or lack of air,
Moss told Live Science. For example, some congenital heart defects cause
circulation to bypass the lungs, meaning
the blood is poorly oxygenated.
However,
the increased understanding that people with COVID-19 may show up with these
atypical coronavirus symptoms is changing the way doctors treat them. Normal
blood-oxygen levels are around 97%, Moss said, and it becomes worrisome when
the numbers drop below 90%. At levels below 90%, the brain may not get
sufficient oxygen, and patients might start experiencing confusion, lethargy or
other mental disruptions. As levels drop into the low 80s or below, the danger
of damage to vital organs rises.
However,
patients may not feel in as dire straits as they are. A lot of coronavirus
patients show up at the hospital with oxygen saturations in the low 80s but look fairly comfortable and
alert, said Dr. Astha Chichra, a critical care physician at Yale School of
Medicine. They might be slightly short
of breath, but not in proportion to the lack of oxygen they're receiving.
There
are three major reasons people feel a sense of dyspnea, or labored breathing,
Moss said. One is something obstructing the airway, which is not an issue in
COVID-19. Another is when carbon dioxide
builds up in the blood. A good example of that phenomenon is during
exercise: Increased metabolism means more carbon dioxide production, leading to
heavy breathing to exhale all that CO2.
A
third phenomenon, particularly important in respiratory disease, is decreased
lung compliance. Lung compliance refers to the ease with which the lungs move
in and out with each breath. In pneumonia and
in ARDS, fluids in the lungs fill microscopic air sacs called alveoli, where
oxygen from the air diffuses into the blood. As the lungs fill with fluid, they
become more taut and stiffer, and the person's chest and abdominal muscles must
work harder to expand and contract the lungs in order to breathe. This
happens in severe COVID-19, too. But in some patients, the fluid buildup is not
enough to make the lungs particularly stiff. Their oxygen levels may be low for an unknown reason that doesn't
involve fluid buildup — and one that doesn't trigger the body's need to gasp
for breath. - https://www.livescience.com/silent-hypoxia-killing-covid-19-coronavirus-patients.html
How Does Coronavirus
Kill
Normally, oxygen crosses
the alveoli into the capillaries, tiny blood vessels that lie beside the air
sacs; the oxygen is then carried to the rest of the body. But as the immune system wars with the invader,
the battle itself disrupts this healthy oxygen transfer. Front-line white
blood cells release inflammatory molecules called chemokines, which in turn
summon more immune cells that target and kill virus-infected cells, leaving a
stew of fluid and dead cells—pus—behind. This is the underlying pathology of
pneumonia, with its corresponding symptoms: coughing; fever; and rapid, shallow
respiration (see graphic). Some COVID-19 patients recover, sometimes with no
more support than oxygen breathed in through nasal prongs.
But others
deteriorate, often quite suddenly, developing a condition called acute
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Oxygen levels in their blood plummet and they struggle ever harder to
breathe. On x-rays and computed tomography scans, their lungs are riddled with
white opacities where black space—air—should be. Commonly, these patients end
up on ventilators. Many die. Autopsies show their alveoli became stuffed with
fluid, white blood cells, mucus, and the detritus of destroyed lung cells.-
This of
course is why many patients need to be put on ventilators, however, Doctors are
currently debating ventilator use:
Why
Ventilators May Not Be Working as Well for COVID-19 Patients as Doctors Hoped
New York City
emergency-medicine physician Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell sparked controversy when,
two weeks ago, he posted a YouTube video claiming that ventilators may be
harming COVID-19 patients more than they’re helping.
“We are operating under a
medical paradigm that is untrue,” Kyle-Sidell warned. “I believe we are
treating the wrong disease, and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead
to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short
time.”
Weeks later, claims from
Kyle-Sidell and like-minded doctors continue to spark impassioned debate within
the medical community, with some doctors moving away from the use of
ventilators and others defending the current standard of care. What’s clear,
though, is COVID-19 patients on
ventilators aren’t doing as well as doctors would hope—and health care experts
are scrambling to fix it.
Mechanical ventilation always
comes with risks: a tube must be placed into a patient’s airway to deliver
oxygen to their body when their lungs no longer can. It’s an invasive form of
support, and most doctors view it as a last resort. Under the best of circumstances, up to half of patients sick enough to
require this type of ventilation won’t make it. - https://time.com/5820556/ventilators-covid-19/
Only half of
UK's sickest coronavirus patients put on ventilators
The rush to increase the number
of ventilators in Britain from 8,000 to 18,000 was a response to early
assumptions that intubation was the only way to save the lives of those who
become severely ill. Industry was urged to switch production, and Dyson was
among the companies volunteering to help, but it has now been told by the
government its services are not needed.
This may now look like an
over-reaction, but one leading intensive care expert said the government had
little choice. The Imperial College modelling prediction of 250,000 UK deaths
was based partly on a shortfall in the number of ventilators in the NHS.
“It is easy in retrospect,”
said Mervyn Singer, a professor of intensive care medicine at University
College London. “Governments had to prepare for the worst and hope for the
best. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle.” Singer talked to
colleagues in China and in Italy about their experiences before the UK’s
intensive care units started to fill up. “We started off with a strategy to try
to avoid intubation,” he said.
The alternatives to mechanical ventilation include continuous positive
airway pressure (Cpap). Cpap machines are a type of ventilator that uses a mask
but delivers air at mild pressure without taking over the function of the lungs. It is believed Boris Johnson
was treated with Cpap.
Early fears were that healthcare
workers would be more likely to be infected by Cpap patients, but at University
College hospital that turned out to be unfounded.
Singer and his colleagues wrote
an algorithm for deciding which patients needed intubation and which could be
given other forms of breathing support. They launched their care pathway on 20
March, the day that London’s Northwick Park hospital had to declare an
emergency and send Covid-19 patients to other hospitals. “They were intubating
everyone as per guidance and ended up with no ventilators left and had to
declare a critical emergency,” said Singer.
Around the world, doctors are
increasingly reluctant to use mechanical ventilation for any but the severest
cases. A study of outcomes in New York published on Wednesday in the Journal of
the American Medical Association found
that 88% of those put on mechanical ventilation in critical care units died. But that’s a Catch 22 situation, say UK experts.
These were probably the sickest patients, whose lungs were barely functioning
and would have died without invasive ventilation.- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/26/only-half-of-uks-sickest-coronavirus-patients-put-on-ventilators
Further Articles:
Doctors debate when best to place virus
patients on ventilators –
Are Ventilators Being Overused On Covid19
Patients? –
As virus advances, doctors rethink rush
to ventilate –
With ventilators running out, doctors say
the machines are overused for COVID19 –
Coronavirus ‘cytokine storm’: this
over-active immune response could be behind some fatal cases of COVID-19 –
NHS – Clinical Management of Persons
Admitted to Hospital with Covid19 –
So to state
it simply: COVID19 starves the blood of oxygen. Disinfectants such as Chlorine
Dioxide and Hydrogen Peroxide when used
correctly can help to oxygenate the blood as well as working to eliminate the
virus. There are a number of other oxygenation therapies that are being
tested for COVID19 such as Oxygen therapy, Ozone therapy, Hyperbaric Oxygen and
many more.
Examples & Explanations of Oxygen,
Ozone & Hyperbaric Therapies:
A layer of ozone is found in the earth’s stratosphere.
Its primary purpose is to protect the earth from the sun’s ultraviolet radiation, most of which it absorbs. In
medicine, ozone therapy is used to disinfect and treat conditions by
disinfecting the area around them, improving the body’s intake and use of
oxygen, and activating the immune system.
Ozone therapy: A clinical review and history –
What is ozone therapy? Benefits and Risks
–
Oxygen Therapy –
Oxygen Therapy working –
Possibility of Using Ozone Micoro Nano
Bubbles –
(Just for fun) How to Kill Coronavirus
with Ozone Gas Generator –
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as treatment
for COVID19 Infection –
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy –
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy –
https://www.ihausa.org/covid19-hyperbaric-therapy/
Section 5: Colds, Flu & Seasonal Patterns
Do colds and influenza appear to have a
seasonal pattern? To back up William N.
Bryan’s practical applications mentioned:
“During winter, levels of ultraviolet radiation
are much lower than in summer. This has a direct effect on how much vitamin
D our bodies can
make. Vitamin D has been
shown to be involved in making an antimicrobial molecule, which has been shown
to limit how well the influenza virus can replicate in
laboratory studies.” - https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320099#Vitamin-D-and-spending-time-indoors-myths
“Studies have shown there is a link between climate and influenza, and that decreases in humidity levels common in
winter months can be a driver during flu season. In a study published online in
the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(PNAS), investigators
cited previous findings that a drop in absolute humidity, which is dependent on
relative humidity and temperature, correlates most closely with the rise in
seasonal influenza-related deaths. In this study the investigators aimed to
look further into the effects of low ambient humidity on enhancing influenza
virus transmission…
“The study team found that the mice kept in low humidity conditions had
impaired defenses and were more susceptible overall to influenza illness and
experienced more severe flu symptoms than mice kept in higher relative
humidity. Lower levels of relative humidity impaired mucociliary clearance and
tissue repair and blocked the induction of the interferon-stimulated genes
known to restrict influenza A viruses, leading to higher viral burden. In
addition, dry air exposure made mice more susceptible to disease mediated by
inflammasome caspases.”- https://www.contagionlive.com/news/lower-humidity-linked-to-more-severe-flu-illness
There have been numerous studies over the years regarding seasonality, light,
humidity and the spread of viruses, for example:
Why The Flu Virus Is More Infectious In
Cold Winter Temperatures –
Flu Virus Fortified Colder Weather –
Yale researchers have pinpointed a key
reason why people are more likely to get sick and even die from flu during winter
months: low humidity –
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190513155635.htm
Section 6: Back to Where We Began, The Briefing:
Later in the
briefing, Trump suggested applying “light and heat to cure,” and Dr. Deborah
Birx, the coordinator of the White House coronavirus task force, responded to
Trump’s question by saying she hasn’t heard of heat or light “as a treatment.”
Trump, April 23: I would like you to speak to the medical
doctors to see if there’s any way that you can apply light and heat to cure. You know — if you could. And maybe
you can, maybe you can’t. Again, I say, maybe you can, maybe you can’t. I’m not
a doctor. But I’m like a person that has a good you know what. Deborah, have
you ever heard of that? The heat and the light, relative to certain viruses,
yes, but relative to this virus?
Birx: Not as a treatment. I
mean, certainly fever is a good thing. When you have a fever, it helps your
body respond. But not as — I’ve not seen heat or light …
Trump: I think it’s a great
thing to look at. I mean, you know. Okay”
Like Trump, Dr. Birx does not have a
medical licence (currently), and like Fauci, Dr Birx is elbows deep in the WHO
and Bill Gates, and if you know what that means, thumbs up to you, you’ve done
some external digging before the Orwellian-censored-dictatorship platforms (Youtube, Facebook and Twitter) dialled up the censorship meter.
Section 7: Stick That In Your Pipe and, er "Light" It? *
Healight,
a Novel Endotracheal Catheter, as a Potential Treatment for Coronavirus
 |
Aytu Healight
|
Aytu BioScience Signs Development Agreement with Sterling Medical Devices
to Advance the Development of Healight as a Potential Coronavirus Treatment
ENGLEWOOD,
CO / ACCESSWIRE / April 27, 2020 Aytu BioScience, Inc. (NASDAQ:AYTU) (the
"Company"), a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on
commercializing novel products that address significant patient needs announced
today that it has signed an agreement with Sterling Medical Devices
("Sterling") to finalize the development of Healight, a novel
endotracheal catheter, as a potential treatment for coronavirus.
The company announced last week that it licensed
exclusive worldwide rights to the Healight technology from Cedars-Sinai for all
endotracheal and nasopharyngeal indications. The patent-pending Healight
Platform has been in development since 2016 by the Medically Associated Science
and Technology (MAST) team at Cedars-Sinai. Following their pre-clinical findings that Healight may be a safe and
effective antiviral and antibacterial treatment, the team engaged Sterling to
rapidly develop a novel endotracheal device to help combat coronavirus.
"Sterling has
been working with the Cedars-Sinai team for the past several weeks on a very
accelerated schedule to develop this much needed device," said Dan
Sterling, President of Sterling Medical Devices. "We are happy to now be
partnering with Aytu to further advance this critical project as fast as we
possibly can for the many patients in need."
"The Aytu team is very pleased to be working with Sterling Medical on this important
development program and in the fight against coronavirus," stated Josh
Disbrow, Chairman and CEO of Aytu BioScience. Disbrow further commented,
"Sterling has a stellar reputation as a best-in-class medical device
product firm with more than 21 years of experience, over 1,100 projects engineered,
with none failing to receive FDA regulatory approval upon submission. Our team
is actively engaged with our colleagues at Sterling in an effort to finalize
the device development, with hope of enabling human use in the very near
future."
You can learn
more about it on their website here: https://aytubio.com/healight/
Aytu are also providing the
COVID19 Rapid tests:
Aytu
BioScience Announces China Export Clearance of Company's COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid
Test Josh Disbrow, Chief Executive Officer of Aytu
BioScience, commented, "The backlog of medical products being exported
from China created a shipment delay, but Aytu's next 500,000 rapid tests have
now been cleared for shipment to the U.S. This export clearance from China,
along with the additional supply we have secured through our new relationship
with Biolidics, gives us great confidence in our supply chain and ability to
provide these needed test kits to the U.S. medical community. Our shipments
remain on track for delivery and, upon receipt, will be distributed to U.S.
customers."- https://old.nasdaq.com/press-release/aytu-bioscience-announces-china-export-clearance-of-companys-covid19-iggigm-rapid-test-20200430-01301
UVA as an antiviral –
Firm tests UV light treatment that Trump
was mocked for mentioning –
Youtube and Twitter censor pharma company
researching uv light treatment –
So why is
this all important? Because where the USA goes, the UK, and much of the Western
World, generally follows.
Everything
that we have looked at so far shows that heat, light, natural disinfectants and
vitamins (basic science and what should be common knowledge/taught at school)
open up a whole world of possibilities without leading us down the vaccination
route. These are much safer and more natural alternatives. I believe there are possibilities in the pipeline that will evolve
around combining oxygenation therapies and UV light as an effective treatment.
I will be keeping an eye on this as time moves on.
Vaccinations
take a long time to produce, test and manufacture and like other types of flu,
COVID19 is also mutating. Sometimes mutations can either weaken or strengthen a
virus, and naturally, vaccines will have to be updated.
There are a
lot of sources that suggest that vaccines can effectively treat the targeted virus
or disease, but they are not always tested with regards to the effects on the
whole bodily system; and certain vaccines can cause more harm than good, so
this is always a worry. Why should we inject anything that isn’t necessary if
we don’t have to?
This isn’t just me, a nobody just saying this – look it up (TED talks are good
place to start. Oh, and grab the popcorn and watch all the interviews and
presentations where Bill Gates and many others talk about depopulation plans publicly,
this isn’t conspiracy theory anymore, its conspiracy fact).
I will not
go down that controversial vaccination rabbit-hole right now (I’m a
“science-facter” not necessarily an anti-vaxer, shoot me). I don’t feel that
there is anything wrong with looking into alternative therapies, as you’ve now
seen, there is evidence to suggest, and I do believe that we are gradually
entering a time where more natural therapies are coming out of the woodwork for
more than one reason.
Natural
science and logic dictates that it is important to go out in the sunlight, and
wearing a mask where not necessary may do more harm than good. Immunity is
weakened by staying indoors and disinfecting everything we touch and not having
that crucial system building germ and bacteria exposure; living in a “clean”
environment can become an immunosuppressant alone.
This is all food for thought, I do hope you’re full and can digest all
of this! Make of it what you will, I’m just attempting to make things easier to
understand if you should give a damn.
Section 8: Official COVID19 Death Reports & Further Information
Concerned
by the “official” figures of COVID-19 deaths?
Don’t be too worried, it has become
increasingly clear that the numbers of COVID-19 deaths reported are being
misrepresented by governments and the mainstream media. The truth has been
sitting right in front of our eyes.
So, what counts as a COVID-19 death?
In the UK
From Tuesday 28 April, NHS England and NHS
Improvement started to report the number of patient deaths where there has been
no COVID-19 positive test result, but where COVID-19 is documented as a direct
or underlying cause of death on part 1 or part 2 of the death certification
process. This change has been introduced for deaths that occurred
on 24th April and subsequently and is shown separately in the region data table
only. When making comparisons over time these figures should not be included.
Interpretation of the figures should take into
account the fact that totals by date of death are likely to be updated in
future releases for more recent dates. For
example, a positive result for COVID-19 may occur days after confirmation of
death. Cases are only included in the data when the positive COVID-19 test
result is received, or death certificate confirmed with COVID-19 mentioned.
This results in a lag between a given date of death and exhaustive daily death
figures for that day. - https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/
During the UK’s Coronavirus Briefing 25/04,
Pretti Patel said, “Sadly, of those in hospital with the virus, 20,019 have died” - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mpfhZRDeIQ . Note, she did not say from or of
Coronavirus. Nor did she specifically say COVID-19 (not that it’s unusual for
anyone to say Coronavirus instead of COVID-19, but we have to think critically
in these times) this could easily imply that those who are in hospital with
coronavirus, simply have the flu and are in hospital for pre-existing or
underlying conditions.
For a more in depth explanation, please
watch the excellent video by Observation Deck explaining the
COVID19 death figures - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFIMsi5VUpo&feature=youtu.be
In the USA
The federal government is classifying the deaths of
patients infected with the coronavirus as COVID-19 deaths, regardless of any
underlying health issues that could have contributed to the loss of someone’s
life.
Dr. Deborah Birx, the response coordinator for the
White House coronavirus task force, said the federal government is continuing
to count the suspected COVID-19 deaths,
despite other nations doing the opposite.
“There are other countries that if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU
[intensive care unit] and then have a
heart or kidney problem,” she said during a Tuesday news briefing at the
White House. “Some countries are
recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death.
“The intent is … if someone dies with COVID-19, we are
counting that,”
she added…
…[cont] Dr. Michael Baden, a Fox News contributor,
said it’s reasonable to include the death of someone infected with the virus,
who also had other health issues, in the COVID-19 body count.
“In the normal course, autopsies would then
determine whether the person died of the effects of the COVID virus, whether
the person had a brain tumor or brain hemorrhage, for example, that might be
unrelated to it and what the relative significance of both the infection and
the pre-existing disease is,” Baden told Fox News.
However, the
number of autopsies being performed could be low due to the danger of infection,
he said.
“Then you will include in those numbers some
people who did have a pre-existing condition that would have caused death
anyway, but that’s probably a small number,” Baden said. - https://nypost.com/2020/04/07/feds-classify-all-coronavirus-patient-deaths-as-covid-19-deaths/
The director of the Illinois
department of public health, Dr. Ngozi Ezike has also been very clear on what counts as a COVID death:
“…I just want to be clear in terms of
the definition of people dying of Covid. The case definition is very
simplistic, it means at the time of death it was a Covid positive diagnosis, so
that means that if you were in a hospice and had already been given a few weeks
to live and then you also were found to have Covid, that would be counted as a
Covid death, it means that if technically, if you died of a clear alternate
cause, but had Covid at the same time, it would still be listed as a Covid
death. Everyone who’s listed as a Covid death, doesn’t mean that that was the
cause of death but that they had Covid at the time of death” – https://youtu.be/vM4_xJYD1uk?t=904
Despite being given the definition of what counts as a
COVID-19 death by health officials and governments, the truth is completely
misrepresented. As reported by Global Pundit.com :
Coronavirus
Death Counts Reported by Media Outpace Actual Deaths Reported Per CDC By Nearly
29,000
The media is reporting massive death counts from the China
coronavirus. These counts are coming from a couple of sources, one of
which is the Worldometer coronavirus website. The death counts on these
sites and in the media are over reporting the number of China coronavirus
deaths by 62% when compared to the data at the CDC
website. As of April 25, 2020, the CDC reported that
33,513 Americans died from the China coronavirus. Note that their number
includes confirmed or presumed to be COVID-19 deaths.
Thanks for such an informative post. You have mentioned the amazing fact. your articles are always amazing. keep posting! micro nano bubble generator
ReplyDelete